Back to explorer

entry

innocence

/ˈɪnəsn̩s/

Freedom from guilt, harm, or moral fault

From Latin in- (not) + Latin noc- (harm).

noun
in-
Latin
AI-inferred
in-
negative prefix, 'not, without'
Latin
Verified
innocentia
the 'not-hurtful' quality

from Latin innocentia "blamelessness, uprightness, integrity,"

+1 more source
noc-
Latin
AI-inferred
nocere
to harm, injure
Latin
AI-inferred
nocens
harming, guilty
Latin
Verified
innocentia
harmlessness; blamelessness

from Latin innocentia "blamelessness, uprightness, integrity,"

+1 more source
Combined
innocentia
Latin compound idea: 'not harming' becomes 'blamelessness'
Old French
Verified
inocence
the word narrows into moral and bodily purity

from Old French inocence "innocence; purity, chastity" (12c., Modern French innocence )

Middle English
Verified
innocence
borrowed into English in the 14th century

from Middle English innocence

Modern English
innocence

A Roman could say innocens about someone who wasn’t causing trouble — not plotting, not injuring, not staining the room with moral mud. That’s the neat trick here: Latin in- means “not,” while nocere means “to hurt,” so the word is literally built out of a refusal to wound. The same family gives us innocuous, noxious, and the rarer nocent, so you can hear the old harm-vocabulary still rattling around inside the modern word. By the 12th century Old French had inocence, and Middle English took it over in the 1300s, where it could mean purity, chastity, or simply the lack of legal guilt. In other words, innocence is not a blank slate so much as a shield: the ancient promise that nothing in you has drawn blood.

§