Back to explorer

entry

inviolate

/ɪnˈvaɪələt/

untouched; not violated or harmed

From Latin in- (not) + Latin viol- (to violate).

adjective
in-
Latin
AI-inferred
in-
negative prefix meaning 'not'
Middle English
Verified
inviolat
received as part of the borrowed form from Latin

from Latin inviolatus "unhurt,"

+1 more source
viol-
Latin
Verified
violatus
wounded, harmed; from the same family as violation

from Latin inviolatus "unhurt,"

+1 more source
Latin
Verified
inviolatus
unhurt; not violated

from Latin inviolatus "unhurt,"

+1 more source
Middle English
Verified
inviolat
borrowed adjective form

from Latin inviolatus "unhurt,"

+1 more source
Combined
inviolatus
Latin compound meaning 'not violated,' later borrowed into Middle English
Modern English
Verified
inviolate
standard adjective meaning unbroken, untouched, secure from harm

from Middle English inviolat, inviolate

Modern English
inviolate

A Roman lawyer would have recognized the logic instantly: if you can violate a boundary, then add a neat little in- in front of it and you get the opposite, something untouched. That’s the whole trick behind inviolatus, the Latin ancestor that English borrowed in the early 15th century, when scribes were still happily importing learned words by the cartload. The second half lives in the family of violation and violate, so inviolate is basically the peace treaty version of a much rougher verb. You can hear the same trust-and-breach drama in inviolable, violation, and violent — words that all circle the idea of crossing a line. It’s a wonderfully Roman bit of engineering: take a word for breaking, bolt on a negative prefix, and out comes a word that feels like a sealed temple door nobody has the nerve to touch.

§